top of page

Gehraiyaan (2022) — The Right Story, Told Without Emotional Clarity: A Story-First Diagnosis

  • Writer: Sajeev Varghese
    Sajeev Varghese
  • Mar 29
  • 6 min read
Because somewhere between intention and execution, the audience got left behind.
Because somewhere between intention and execution, the audience got left behind.

When Gehraiyaan was released in February 2022 on OTT, India was just emerging from one of the most emotionally exhausting periods in its modern history. The COVID-19 lockdown had not just been a public health crisis — it had been a psychological, financial, and emotional crisis for millions of families.


And into that emotional landscape arrived a film about:

  • Urban loneliness

  • Infidelity

  • Emotional trauma

  • Wealthy lifestyles

  • Yacht vacations

  • Self-destructive relationships


The debates that followed across Indian households, WhatsApp groups, and Zoom calls were intense.


But the debate was framed incorrectly.


The question people asked was:

“Is this a good film or a bad film?”


Gehraiyaan (2022) was not a bad idea for a film.


It was not even a bad theme.


In fact, at its core, Gehraiyaan had the ingredients of a powerful Story-First film:

  • Adult relationships

  • Emotional baggage

  • Childhood trauma

  • Ambition and insecurity

  • Moral ambiguity

  • Consequences of choices


This is the kind of material from which deep, mature cinema is made.

And yet, the film did not land with the audience the way it could have.


Why?


It created a subtle but powerful emotional reaction in the audience:


“We cannot relate to this world — so why should we emotionally invest in these people?”


This is not about morality.

This is not about bold scenes.

This is about emotional relatability.


And relatability is not about income level.

It is about emotional truth.


Gehraiyaan felt emotionally imported, not emotionally rooted.

And audiences can sense that immediately.


Gehraiyaan - Official Trailer | Deepika Padukone, Siddhant Chaturvedi, Ananya, Dhairya| Shakun Batra

The narrative had very heavy plot points.


But powerful events in a story must feel earned, not inserted.

In strong storytelling:


Event → Consequence → Escalation → Point of No Return → Tragedy


In Gehraiyaan, the escalation felt like:


Event → Big Event → Bigger Event → Shock → Ending


So instead of feeling like a psychological descent, it felt like a dramatic escalation.


That is a structural problem, not an acting problem, not a cinematography problem, not a music problem.


So, it had a storytelling architecture problem.


From a Story-First Filmmaking point of view, the answer is simple:


Gehraiyaan was the right story…but it was not told with enough emotional clarity for the audience to travel the journey with the protagonist.


And that made all the difference.


Story-First Filmmaking — The Real Definition


There is a fundamental misunderstanding in Indian cinema today.


Many believe storytelling is:

  • Plot

  • Twists

  • Dialogues

  • Scenes

  • Cinematography

  • Performances


But Story-First Filmmaking is not about writing scenes.


Story-First Filmmaking is the discipline of designing immersive emotional journeys that move the audience, engage the mind, and ultimately lead the audience to believe in something, internalize it, and carry it into their own lives.


That is what great films do.


They don’t just show you events.


They design your emotional journey.


They guide:

  • What you feel

  • When you feel it

  • How deeply you feel it

  • And what you understand because of it


In other words:


Storytelling is the art and discipline of designing a message so that it can be received, felt, understood, and not just remembered — but believed and internalized by a specific audience.


And this is where Gehraiyaan faltered.


Not in intention.

But in emotional design.


The film appears to be a sordid tale rife with steamy sex scenes and scandalous bouts of cheating.
The film appears to be a sordid tale rife with steamy sex scenes and scandalous bouts of cheating.

If Gehraiyaan Were a Story-First Film


Let us imagine Gehraiyaan being made using Story-First principles.

Same theme.

Same characters.

Same emotional core.


But told differently.


Because the problem was never the story.


The problem was how the audience was made to experience the story.


A Story-First version of Gehraiyaan would have focused on one thing above all:

The emotional journey of the protagonist — and making the audience travel that journey with her, step by step.


Not through sudden bursts of drama.

Not through stylish scenes on yachts and parties.

Not through shock plot points.


But through earned emotion.


A Story-First structure would have looked something like this:


Act 1 — Emotional Foundation


We deeply understand:

  • Her childhood

  • Her insecurity

  • Her relationship with her father

  • Her fear of abandonment

  • Her need to be seen

  • Her emotional loneliness


So when she makes a morally questionable decision later, the audience may not approve — but they understand.


And that is the difference between:

  • Audience judging the character

  • Audience traveling with the character


Great films make the audience travel.


Act 2 — Emotional Descent


Her relationship begins to:

  • Feel like escape

  • Then feel like validation

  • Then feel like dependence

  • Then feel like fear

  • Then feel like a trap


The audience should feel:

  • Attraction

  • Comfort

  • Doubt

  • Anxiety

  • Suffocation


In that order.


That is emotional design.

Not melodrama.

Not shouting.

Not sudden twists.

But a gradual emotional descent.


Act 3 — Consequences and Meaning


Now the events of the film happen.


But now they mean something, because the audience has traveled the road emotionally.


So the climax is not just:

  • A crime

  • A betrayal

  • A death

  • A reveal


The climax becomes:

The inevitable emotional consequence of a series of human choices.


Now the film becomes meaningful.

Now the film becomes a tragedy.

Now the film stays with you.


The Real Lesson from Gehraiyaan

The lesson is not about urban India.

The lesson is not about relationships.

The lesson is not about morality.


The real lesson is this:

How a story is told matters more than the story itself.


You can have:

  • A great idea — and make a bad film.

  • A simple idea — and make a great film.


Because audiences do not experience:

The story you wrote.


They experience:

The emotional journey you designed for them.


And if that journey is not clear, not earned, and not guided properly — the audience disconnects.


Not because they are not intelligent.

Not because they are “not mature enough.”


But because:


The messenger did not design the message for the audience to receive it emotionally.


And this is where the Producer must step in.

Because ultimately:


The Producer is not just financing a film.

The Producer is designing how the audience will experience the story.


That is the real job of a Producer.


The story on inter-generational trauma we never knew we needed
The story on inter-generational trauma we never knew we needed

Final Story-First Verdict — Gehraiyaan


From a Story-First perspective:

Pillar

Verdict

Believable

Low (for Indian context)

Emotionally Engaging

Medium

Intellectually Compelling

Low

Relevant

Niche

Meaningful

Medium

Global Resonance

Low–Medium

Told Right?

Low


Final Diagnosis:


Gehraiyaan was the right story…but not told with enough emotional clarity for the audience to travel the journey with the protagonist.


And that is the ultimate irony.


A film called Gehraiyaan — Depths —

did not fully take the audience into its depths.


Because in cinema, as in life:

It is not enough to have something to say.


You must say it in a way that people can receive it, feel it, believe it, and carry it with them.


That is storytelling craft.


Closing Monologue — The Story-First Imperative


Let me end with this, because this is important for the future of Indian cinema.

Story-First Filmmaking is not about writing stories.


Story-First Filmmaking is about designing emotional journeys.


Journeys that:

  • Move the audience

  • Engage the mind

  • Challenge beliefs

  • Reveal uncomfortable truths

  • And leave a meaningful impact long after the film ends


Because when storytelling is done right, films do not just entertain.


They:

  • Change how people think

  • Change how people feel

  • Change how people see themselves

  • Change how societies see themselves


And that is why filmmaking, when done right, is one of the most powerful forces in the world.


Which is why the question Indian filmmakers must start asking is no longer:


“Is this a good story?”


But:


“Have we designed this story so that the audience can live it, feel it, understand it, and carry it into their own lives?”


Because in the end:


Story-First Filmmaking is the discipline of designing immersive emotional journeys that move the audience, engage the mind, and ultimately lead the audience to believe in something, internalize it, and carry it into their own lives.


And that… changes everything.


Indian cinema can either remain trapped in its own echo chamber — or rise as a global storytelling powerhouse.


👉 Are you ready to see your film through the lens of Story-First Intelligence?


🟢 Learn more. Get leveled-up. Join the Rewrite.





And it starts with you.


The Rewrite Generation begins with you. 🎬🔥

 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page