Bollywood’s House of Cards is Collapsing—And Dharma Productions is the First to Fall
For decades, Bollywood thrived on illusion—manufactured stardom, inflated box office figures, and a self-indulgent ecosystem that prioritized privilege over talent. But the illusion is shattering at breakneck speed, and at the center of this collapse stands Dharma Productions, once a symbol of Bollywood’s dominance, which is now a cautionary tale of its downfall.
The recent 50% stake sale of Dharma Productions wasn’t just a financial decision—it was a desperate lifeline for a sinking empire. Karan Johar, the once-untouchable filmmaker who inherited his father Yash Johar’s legacy, has spent years churning out hollow, formulaic films, banking on nostalgia and nepotism rather than innovation and storytelling craft. The result? Audiences have walked away, and the industry has lost its grip.
Meanwhile, Anurag Kashyap, once a mentee of Johar, has walked away from Bollywood altogether. In a scathing public statement, he exposed the toxic creative vacuum, the suffocating echo chamber, and the sheer lack of artistic integrity that has turned Bollywood into a creative wasteland. The fact that Kashyap’s exit and Dharma’s financial downfall happened in close proximity to each other is no coincidence—it’s a loud, undeniable signal that Bollywood’s old guard is crumbling under its own weight.
This is not just a studio in distress. This is the moment Bollywood either reinvents itself or fades into irrelevance. The audience has spoken. The box office failures have stacked up. The global film industry has moved ahead.
So what went wrong? And more importantly—can Bollywood still be saved?
Why is Bollywood Failing?
The interviews with Karan Johar and Apoorva Mehta (Dharma's CEO) offer a rare and damning insight into why Bollywood is collapsing from within. The industry's biggest stakeholders are either deluded about the failures or gaslighting the audience into believing everything is fine.
1. The "Product" Without a Value Proposition
Apoorva Mehta, in his 2022 interview, openly acknowledged that a movie is a product. However, he conveniently ignored the most fundamental truth: a movie's value proposition is a good story, well told. Instead, Dharma Productions consistently churned out glossy, superficial, formulaic, and insipid films (Kalank, Gehraiyaan, Jugg Jug Jeeyo, Brahmastra, Liger, Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani).
These movies relied on mega-star parades, empty spectacle, and aggressive marketing deception rather than actual storytelling. The audience was duped into watching trailers that promised depth and substance but delivered nothing more than Bollywood’s standard fare of nepotism-driven mediocrity.
The result? A total breakdown of trust. Indian audiences are no longer falling for the charade.
2. Karan Johar’s Nepotism, Arrogance & Victim Card
Karan Johar has spent years shaping Bollywood into a nepotism-fueled bubble, where only star kids and industry insiders are promoted. His infamous “nepotism is here to stay” stance alienated countless genuinely talented actors, writers, and filmmakers who could have revitalized Hindi cinema.
Yet, in his 2024 interview with Faye D'Souza, Johar played the victim card, blaming the media, social media trolls, and even the audience for his failures. Rather than accepting responsibility for the disastrous choices in filmmaking and creative bankruptcy, he painted himself as a misunderstood figure.
His public meltdown about social anxiety and childhood struggles, while valid on a personal level, came across as a calculated distraction from Dharma's creative failures. When his films flopped, instead of introspecting, he lamented, “Why do they hate me?” as if the rejection of poorly made movies was a personal attack.
3. Dharma Productions: A Legacy Squandered
Under Yash Johar, Dharma Productions stood for well-crafted mainstream cinema with heart. But after his demise, Karan Johar turned his father’s production house into a rehash factory, constantly recycling old Dharma formulas under the pretense of “reinventing Bollywood.”
Take Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani—a lazy patchwork of tropes from Yash Johar's films, Bollywood’s 90s melodramas, and even Karan’s own previous works. The industry and the audience saw through it.
What are these guys trying to pull? Simply put, they are trying to survive by repackaging nostalgia as originality while blaming audiences for rejecting their lack of innovation.
The Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahani Delusion: Karan Johar’s False Validation & Bollywood’s Downward Spiral
Karan Johar, after a seven-year hiatus from directing, returned to the big screen with Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahani, convinced that this was the validation he needed to cement his legacy as a great filmmaker. And perhaps, within the confines of his Bollywood echo chamber, where sycophants line up to shower him with praise, he got that validation. But step outside the gilded gates of Johar’s insular world, and the reality is much harsher—Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahani was an absolute trainwreck from a storytelling and cinematic craft perspective.
This wasn’t a grand comeback. This was a desperate attempt to pass off nostalgia as reinvention, a self-indulgent vanity project masked as progressive cinema, and yet another tired rehash of the same Yash Johar-Karan Johar tropes that audiences have rejected time and again.
So why did Rocky Aur Rani fail so spectacularly?
1. A Rehash, Not a Reinvention
Karan Johar has always prided himself on making films that celebrate grand romance, family drama, and spectacle. But Rocky Aur Rani was nothing more than a greatest-hits compilation of past Bollywood films, with absolutely no originality.
🔸 Rocky Randhawa (Ranveer Singh) was yet another over-the-top Punjabi caricature—a muscle-bound, loudmouthed gym bro who magically becomes "woke" after meeting the intellectual Bengali journalist Rani Chatterjee (Alia Bhatt). If this sounds familiar, it’s because it is—it’s the same tired Bollywood trope of "Punjabi munda meets a sophisticated girl from a culturally superior family."
🔸 The film blatantly copied elements from Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham, Kal Ho Naa Ho, 2 States, and even Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna—yet Johar packaged it as "modern storytelling."
🔸 At its core, Rocky Aur Rani was supposed to be a progressive love story challenging gender roles and family traditions. But in execution? It was nothing more than a shallow, checklist-driven movie that screamed "wokeness" without actually earning it.
2. Preachy, Performative, and Insulting to the Audience’s Intelligence
Karan Johar tried to market Rocky Aur Rani as a "progressive" film. But true progressive storytelling doesn’t need to shout its message—it shows it through compelling, layered narratives.
Instead, what we got was lazy, on-the-nose, performative wokeness that beat the audience over the head with hollow lectures.
🔹 Rocky Aur Rani wanted to break stereotypes, but it ended up reinforcing them instead.
🔹 Rocky’s character arc—a hyper-masculine man "learning" feminism—was handled in the most surface-level way possible. His transformation felt forced, unearned, and written purely for social media applause.
🔹 The "progressive" themes were completely undermined by the film’s melodramatic, over-the-top execution. Rather than truly questioning patriarchal family structures, Rocky Aur Rani resorted to loud confrontations and exaggerated drama that felt like a soap opera rather than meaningful storytelling.
3. Shallow Characterization & Zero Emotional Depth
At the heart of every great romance is emotional depth and character complexity. But Rocky Aur Rani had neither.
📌 Rocky Randhawa’s "transformation" was superficial at best. His change of heart was rushed, inconsistent, and had no real depth. One moment he’s a clueless gym bro, the next he’s lecturing his family about feminism. The shift was unbelievable and lazily written.
📌 Rani Chatterjee was supposed to be a strong, independent woman, but she ended up being a Bollywood cliché. She existed not as a fleshed-out character, but as a plot device to "educate" Rocky and justify the film’s pseudo-progressive messaging.
📌 The supporting cast was wasted. Instead of adding real stakes, complexity, or depth to the narrative, they were used as mere plot devices to create artificial conflicts. Johar assembled an all-star ensemble cast but failed to use them effectively.
4. Spectacle Over Storytelling—Again.
Johar has a history of prioritizing visual grandeur over narrative depth, and Rocky Aur Rani was no different.
🎭 Lavish sets, elaborate costumes, and extravagant musical numbers took precedence over actual storytelling craft.
🎭 The film constantly tried to distract audiences from its weak script by throwing in nostalgic song remixes, unnecessary dance sequences, and Karan Johar’s signature "rich people aesthetics."
🎭 At its worst, Rocky Aur Rani felt like one long Dharma Productions fashion show, rather than a meaningful love story.
5. The Audience Has Moved On—Karan Johar Has Not.
The failure of Rocky Aur Rani is emblematic of a larger crisis in Bollywood. Indian audiences are rejecting hollow, formulaic filmmaking, yet Johar and his refusal to evolve.
Compare this to South Indian cinema, where movies like Pushpa, Vikram, Kantara, and Jailer are thriving. Why? Because they tell stories with conviction, authenticity, and cinematic discipline. They aren’t manufactured inside an echo chamber for social media validation—they are made to engage, entertain, and resonate with audiences on a deep level.
Karan Johar, on the other hand, still believes that shoving a tired Bollywood formula down audiences’ throats while marketing it as "progressive" is enough.
But audiences aren’t buying it anymore.
The Verdict: Karan Johar’s "Validation" is an Illusion.
Johar may believe Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahani was the validation he needed. But the only validation that matters is the one from the audience—and they rejected this film.
This wasn’t a triumphant return to form. This was a glaring reminder of why Bollywood is in crisis.
The contrast between Chupke Chupke (1975) and Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani (2023) in the RomCom genre is a glaring testament across Hindi films to the enduring power of storytelling craft versus manufactured hype. The IMDb user rating distributions tell the real story—Chupke Chupke follows a natural Gaussian distribution, signifying genuine audience appreciation with a consistent and organic spread of ratings. The film’s success lies in its witty screenplay, nuanced performances, and effortless charm, making it a timeless classic that resonates even today.
On the other hand, Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani defies the Gaussian normal distribution, with erratic spikes in ratings that hint at artificial inflation through marketing stunts and PR-driven manipulation. Instead of delivering a story-first experience, the film relied on a shallow, over-the-top spectacle, loud caricatures, and the same overused Bollywood tropes, failing to strike an emotional chord with discerning audiences. The 6.5/10 stars rating, despite the aggressive promotional machinery, exposes the disconnect between the makers and the audience. When a film has to be force-fed to audiences instead of naturally earning their love, it’s already a lost cause. Chupke Chupke proved that storytelling finesse triumphs over extravagant gimmicks—something Bollywood desperately needs to relearn.
Reimagine a Path Forward in Filmmaking with the Foundations of Storytelling
If Karan Johar truly wants to reclaim his relevance in cinema, he must abandon the manufactured grandeur, the forced nostalgia, and the lazy storytelling—and start making films that actually matter by returning to the fundamentals of great storytelling. His career has been defined by spectacle—opulent sets, designer wardrobes, and carefully curated Bollywood nostalgia—but none of that substitutes for the raw, universal power of a well-told story. To begin this transformation, he must look back—not at his own past glories, but at the very foundation of storytelling itself.
A good starting point? Aristotle’s Poetics—the blueprint for all enduring drama. It lays out the essential elements that make a story compelling: a well-structured plot, deeply flawed characters undergoing real transformation, a catharsis that moves audiences at a primal level, and themes that transcend time and culture. These aren’t optional components—they are the very essence of why stories endure. Johar must break free from his reliance on shallow characterizations and formulaic narratives and instead craft films where conflict isn’t just a family feud dressed in couture, but a deeply human struggle with universal stakes.
And if he’s looking for a filmmaker to model his reinvention after, he needn’t look to Hollywood—he need only look at Satyajit Ray. Ray’s films didn’t rely on box office gimmicks or extravagant marketing campaigns. They thrived on pure cinematic mastery—where every frame served the story, every line of dialogue revealed character, and every moment resonated with deep emotional truth. Films like Pather Panchali and Charulata remind us that cinema, at its core, is about capturing the human experience in its most authentic form.
If Karan Johar truly wishes to leave behind a lasting legacy—not just within his industry bubble, but in world cinema—he must rethink his approach from the ground up. Not through louder marketing or bigger budgets, but by embracing the storytelling discipline that has defined great cinema for centuries. It’s time to discard mediocrity and chase mastery. Because in the end, only deeply human stories that are told with exquisite storytelling craft about our shared humanity will stand the test of time and audiences everywhere will continue to find them in better cinema elsewhere.
Bollywood’s Reckoning: The Dawn of a Storytelling Renaissance
The sale of 50% of Dharma Productions isn’t just a business deal—it’s a glaring symbol of an industry in freefall. Bollywood’s decades-long reliance on star power over substance, marketing over mastery, and entitlement over evolution has finally caught up. The audience has spoken loud and clear: no more manufactured spectacles, no more lazy storytelling, no more taking them for granted.
While Bollywood clings to outdated formulas, the world has moved on. South Indian cinema is leading with bold narratives and technical brilliance. Hollywood continues to push boundaries in storytelling, while global industries like Korean and European cinema are making waves with emotionally gripping, universally relevant films.
What is Bollywood doing? Recycling tropes, reselling nostalgia, and rewarding mediocrity.
But here’s the truth: this collapse isn’t a tragedy—it’s an opportunity. The industry can either double down on arrogance and sink further into irrelevance or rise from the ashes by embracing a new era of story-first filmmaking.
✅ This is the moment for reinvention.
✅ This is the moment to prioritize writing over hype, craft over clout, and vision over vanity.
✅ This is the moment for true filmmakers to reclaim the soul of Indian cinema.
The world isn’t waiting. The choice is clear:
🔥 Evolve or perish.
🎬 Master storytelling or fade into obscurity.
🚀 Lead the cinematic revolution or watch India’s greatest film potential slip away.
Indian filmmakers, the time for change isn’t tomorrow. It’s NOW. The revolution has begun.
Are you ready to tell stories that truly matter?
תגובות