top of page

🎬 Case Study: Coolie and War 2 — When the South Followed Bollywood Into the Abyss

  • Writer: Sajeev Varghese
    Sajeev Varghese
  • Aug 16
  • 6 min read

Updated: Aug 18


Why India’s Biggest Summer Tentpoles of 2025 Failed the Story-First Test
Why India’s Biggest Summer Tentpoles of 2025 Failed the Story-First Test

🌟 The Illusion of Spectacle, The Absence of Story


2025 was supposed to be the year of Indian cinema’s summer resurrection. On paper, Coolie and War 2 looked like surefire hits — mega-stars, massive budgets, marketing blitzkriegs. But what audiences got instead were hollow spectacles, cobbled together by tired formulas, false urgency, and loud distractions.


The tragic twist? This time, it wasn’t just Bollywood. The South — once revered for its cinematic soul — had caught the same virus: a pandemic of storytelling neglect. What started as a Bollywood sickness has now metastasized across industries.


Coolie, directed by Lokesh Kanagaraj (yes, the same director who gave us Vikram), turned into a walking tribute to Rajinikanth's aging stardom. War 2 (directed by Ayan Mukerji, after the Brahmastra disaster), another YRF 'Spy Universe' factory product, was so drenched in green-screen testosterone that even the shadows felt artificial.


What’s dying in Indian cinema today isn’t budgets, or stardom, or ambition.


What’s dying is craft.


🎥 The Breakdown: When Storytelling is Sacrificed at the Altar of Spectacle


1. 🧠 Believability: Lost in Slow-Mo


In both Coolie and War 2, reality is no longer a requirement — it's an inconvenience.

  • Coolie expects us to believe a 75-year-old man can fistfight gravity.

  • War 2 turns physics into a suggestion.


What physics? What chemistry? It's all action, bro!
What physics? What chemistry? It's all action, bro!

There’s no grounding, no plausibility. Just shiny-object-here syndrome, dressed up as cinematic flair.


“Audiences aren’t stupid. They’re underserved.” — SV


2. ❤️ Emotional Engagement: Missing in Montage


Neither film lets characters breathe.


Every emotion is rushed, musical, and montage-ified.The result? Viewers can’t feel anything.


A 75-year-old actor trying to be 30?
A 75-year-old actor trying to be 30?

There are no relationships to invest in. No stakes. Just visual chaos and testosterone-fueled sound design.


"A story that doesn’t make you feel isn’t a story. It’s a slideshow.” — SV


3. 🧠 Intellectual Depth: Drowned in Dialogue-Baazi


Loudness is not substance. But in these films, dialogue delivery = depth.

Lines are shouted, not spoken. Scenes are performed, not lived.

There’s no room for subtext, silence, or soul.


Hero-panthi exaggerated to the hilt
Hero-panthi exaggerated to the hilt

Coolie feels like a mass-rally in 4K. War 2 feels like a marketing pitch with action figures.


4. 📌 Relevance: Disconnected from Reality


In a year where India wrestles with real stories — displacement, generational gaps, corruption, female agency, technological disruption — these films offer us:

  • Nostalgia masks

  • Star cameos

  • Nationalist undertones

  • And one forced Aamir Khan's rehabilitation cameo


Aamir Khan's desperation to whitewash the Laal Singh Chaddha and Sitaare Zameen Par aftermath
Aamir Khan's desperation to whitewash the Laal Singh Chaddha and Sitaare Zameen Par aftermath

The world is changing. These films aren’t. That’s the problem.


5. 🔥 Meaningfulness: Zero. Nada. Flatline.


When you strip away the stunts, the budget, and the celebrity cameo, what’s left?


Nothing.

No point.

No purpose.

No promise.


"Stars" and their "Stardoms"
"Stars" and their "Stardoms"

Just recycled stardom and high-decibel noise — all engineered to milk the first 10 days and vanish.


📉 The Business Behind the Creative Collapse


This is the new scam:

  1. Spend ₹100 Cr on marketing.

  2. Flood the screens.

  3. Manipulate perception.

  4. Exit in 2 weeks before the actual reviews catch up.

  5. Blame the audience later.


But guess what? The audience is evolving. They want more.


They want merit-based storytelling.

They want emotional intelligence.

They want films that mean something.


📢 The Story-First Certification Verdict: ❌ FAILED


On our Story-First Certification Pillars, both Coolie and War 2 collapse completely:

Pillar

Verdict

Believability

❌ No

Emotional Engagement

❌ None

Intellectual Depth

❌ Absent

Relevance

❌ Tone-deaf

Meaningfulness

❌ Missing

This is not cinema.This is cynical content in costume.

 


Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer isn't just a blockbuster. It's a revelation — a deeply human epic that smashed through biopic box office records, earning nearly $976 million globally and becoming the highest-grossing World War II and R-rated film ever. Nolan achieved what many deemed impossible: merging intellectual weight with box-office dynamite.


Oscar-Winning Storytelling Craft of Oppenheimer
Oscar-Winning Storytelling Craft of Oppenheimer

 

Nostalgia vs. New Narratives


While summer tentpoles often recycle past formulas, Oppenheimer stands apart. Nolan constantly straddles the line between reverence and reinvention — honoring the legacy of cinematic storytelling while daring to chart fresh territory in narrative craft.

 

Storytelling Structure

Nolan doesn’t just follow J. Robert Oppenheimer’s life— he thrusts us inside it. Employing a first-person screenplay perspective, he immerses us within Oppenheimer’s mind, making us co-narrators of his moral and psychological descent. Themes, dialogue, and pacing are woven into a tapestry that demands engagement, not passive watching.


Visual & Auditory Craft


The film’s aesthetic is cinematic alchemy:

  • Shot on IMAX 65mm (and groundbreaking black-and-white segments), Oppenheimer revels in its own texture.

  • Ludwig Göransson’s score avoids militaristic clichés—instead leaning on foot stomps, Geiger counter static, and over 21 intuited tempo shifts to echo the story’s heartbeat.

  • Practical effects, not CGI, drive the Trinity test scene — making catastrophic awe feel viscerally authentic.


Emotional & Ethical Resonance


Oppenheimer isn’t a sanitized science doc. It confronts the existential gravity of nuclear destruction, wraps it in moral dilemma, and asks deeply personal questions:

  • Nolan uses footage, hearings, and family strife to probe the mind behind the bomb — merging spectacle with reflection.

  • Yet it doesn’t flinch at the fallout — though critics like James Cameron noted Nolan sidestepped graphic devastation, Nolan chose to reflect the psychological aftermath instead.

 

Story-First Certification Pillars – How Oppenheimer Excels

Pillar

Analysis

Believability

Deep psychological realism, despite the scale of catastrophe.

Emotional Engagement

Oppenheimer is haunted, anxious, and tragic — its emotional core ignites.

Intellectual Depth

Physics, ethics, politics — it doesn’t dumb down. It elevates.

Relevance

Humanity’s existential questions haven’t aged; Oppenheimer is timeless.

Meaningfulness

It demands reflection on power, humanity, and the danger of absolutes.

Craft

Cinematic poetry in every visual, performance nuance, and score beat.

 

Oppenheimer - A Mirror to Our Moment


Oppenheimer wasn’t content to entertain; it asked, Who are we? What should we become?


That question, echoing through courtroom hearings and atomic fallout in the film, reverberates with chilling clarity in 2025 — at a time when Responsible AI has shifted from a noble aspiration to a moral imperative. The atomic bomb may have ended a world war, but it also cracked open a moral void we’ve never fully reckoned with. And now, we face a similar precipice.


Just as Oppenheimer unlocked the destructive force of the atom with the best of intentions and the worst of consequences, today’s technologists and storytellers are racing to harness artificial intelligence — without fully confronting its ethical trajectory. The urgency is uncanny. The parallels are disturbing. And the implications are existential.


🎬 Nolan’s film becomes a parable for our time: a stark reminder that brilliance without accountability, invention without wisdom, and ambition without humanity can lead us down the same irreversible path.


And this is where Story-First Intelligence™ becomes more than a creative choice — it becomes our cultural compass.


Because stories are how we imagine futures before we build them.


Stories are how we warn, awaken, and will ourselves toward better outcomes.


So let Oppenheimer do what it was meant to do — not just earn awards, but ignite reflection. And let your next story — as a filmmaker, technologist, or human — be one that dares to reckon before it creates.

 

Call to Action


Here’s your nudge, filmmaker: let Oppenheimer inspire you. Stop chasing trends and start pursuing narrative truth. Let Story-First Intelligence™ guide your craft — because that’s how cinema stays alive.

 

💡 The Wake-Up Call for Filmmakers Across India


The warning signs are blinking red:


The South is no longer immune.

The formula is broken.

Audiences are walking out.

Critics are quiet.

And a generation of filmmakers is burning its chance at legacy to worship at the altar of "mass."


This isn’t just about two films. This is about an entire industry sleepwalking into irrelevance.


It’s time for a reset. A renaissance. A Rewrite.


✊🏽 Call to Action: Activate Your Story-First Intelligence


Indian cinema needs a new operating system — one that prioritizes:


  • Story over star

  • Substance over spectacle

  • Truth over trend


We call it: Story-First Intelligence™.


It’s not a tool. It’s not a gimmick. It’s a mindset.

And it starts with you.

 

👉 Are you ready to see your film through the lens of Story-First Intelligence?


🟢 Learn more. Get leveled-up. Join the Rewrite.



ree

bottom of page